Housing Rights

Housing Rights

Our housing solicitors will take the time to understand your situation and deal with your case sympathetically and will fight on your behalf to get you the best outcome possible.

Our specialist and dedicated team of housing rights solicitors are passionate about defending the rights of those with housing issues and who require housing law advice. Our experienced team of housing solicitors can advise you on all aspects of housing rights including bringing disrepair claims, defending possession proceedings, homelessness reviews and appeals, unlawful evictions and the lawful allocation of social housing. Our team of housing solicitors will deal with your case sympathetically and will fight on your behalf to get the best outcome possible for you.

If your Landlord has received notice of the disrepair and has failed to carry out the repairs within a reasonable period of time, then you have a potential claim for disrepair against them.

HJA Chambers firm logo 2025Our Housing team has been ranked in Band 1 in the Chambers & Partners 2025 legal directory. The team were praised for their “outstanding level of expertise, the client service and second to none care.

Legal 500 UK - Top Tier Firm-2025

“This is one of the leading teams of solicitors in social housing law in England. They regularly take on high-profile and challenging cases in homelessness, allocation of social housing, possession, and disrepair claims.” Legal 500, 2025

We’re proud to be able to help hundreds of people each year to solve their disrepair and other housing problems and achieve swift outcomes.

We can help.

0330 822 3451

or request a callback.

    Our expert housing solicitors are ready to help

    We have a dedicated team of specialist housing solicitors in London. We are independently ranked as some of the best housing solicitors in the UK due to the quality of our work and are here to help you with issues such as housing disrepair, unlawful evictions, homelessness appeals and defending possession claims.

    Our solicitors will take the time to understand your situation and deal with your case sympathetically and will fight on your behalf to get you the best outcome possible.

    HJA Chambers firm logo 2024 PNG Legal 500 UK - Top Tier Firm-2025

    Our Housing legal team has been ranked in Band 1 in the Chambers UK 2025 legal directory. The team were praised for  their “outstanding level of expertise, the client service and second to none care.

    “This is one of the leading teams of solicitors in social housing law in England. They regularly take on high-profile and challenging cases in homelessness, allocation of social housing, possession, and disrepair claims.” – Legal 500, 2025

    Back to top

    Why choose Hodge Jones & Allen for help with your housing rights issue?

    The firm has over 47 years’ experience in asserting clients’ rights, and we deal with a wide range of housing issues including housing disrepair, possession, homelessness, unlawful eviction and anti-social behaviour injunctions.

    We have a proven track record of holding housing providers to account and have consolidated our position as one of the UK’s largest social housing law teams.

    Our housing solicitors are committed to social justice and where eligible, we are able to fund work through legal aid.

    Contact our specialist housing solicitors team on
    0330 822 3451
    or request a call back.
    Back to top

    Housing legal advice services

    Our specialist housing solicitors have expertise in a broad range of housing legal matters including:

    Housing Disrepair Claims

    We understand how disruptive disrepair in your home can be, especially if your landlord has refused to sort repairs or has failed to keep the house in repair. Our team of housing disrepair specialists will endeavour to get you quick results wherever possible to get your landlord to complete repairs to your home which fall within their responsibility.

    Defending Possession Proceedings

    Our compassionate and expert team are well known for representing tenants facing claims for possession of their homes. We can also help if you own your home and your mortgage lender seeks possession. At Hodge Jones & Allen, we understand how difficult and stressful this situation can be and will fight to protect your rights and obtain the best outcome possible for you.

    Unlawful Evictions

    If you are evicted from your home without a court order, or are being harassed or threatened by your landlord we can assist you with obtaining an injunction against your landlord to re-permit you access to the property.

    Homelessness Reviews & Appeals

    We understand that getting the help you need can be difficult if you are homeless or threatened with homelessness. Our housing solicitors are recognised leaders in this field will approach your case sensitively and provide you with clear advice to help you understand your position.

    Back to top

    How do I make a housing disrepair claim?

    Speak to your landlord before pursuing a claim. If they don’t respond in a reasonable time, you may have a housing disrepair claim.

    Contact our specialist housing solicitors for a free initial assessment and to discuss your funding options.

    Our team will assess your case for legal merits and then if there is a legal case, we will allocate it to one of our experienced housing solicitors to deal with your matter.

    We’ll talk through your options and provide you with the best approach for a successful solution.

    Call our expert housing lawyers on
    0330 822 3451
    or request a callback.
    Back to top

    No Win No Fee housing claims

    One funding option we can discuss with you is a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) more commonly known as ‘No Win No Fee’. This allows you to bring a disrepair housing claim, without the need to pay any solicitors’ fees upfront.

    Our expert housing legal team will assess your claim and check if you’re eligible for this funding option. If you want to know more about funding your case with a No Win No Fee agreement, please speak with one of our specialist housing solicitors.

    "My solicitor was very helpful, always provided a prompt response to email or telephone calls. I would definitely recommend to anyone who needs support."

    Back to top

    Why choose Hodge Jones & Allen solicitors?

    Our specialist housing solicitors will handle your case with expertise, discretion and the utmost sensitivity. We’re entirely committed to achieving the best result for all our clients, supporting them through the process and will work hard to get justice for you.

    We are proud to be able to assist people with a wide range of needs, circumstances and from all backgrounds. Our primary objective is to always achieve the best possible results for our clients.

    We are independently ranked as a Band 1 firm for housing law by Chambers & Partners UK.

    Our expert housing solicitors have an excellent track record for successfully challenging authorities and resolving claims quickly with a vast experience dealing with an array of housing legal claims.

    "The team at HJA showed empathy and the highest level of professionalism to my situation, and turned around a possible injustice."

    "The lawyers are very friendly and quick to reply. They solved my case really quickly and kept me informed of everything along the way."

    Back to top

    Featured Cases

    Case Study I

    Over the course of two months, we acted for a homeowner whose neighbour was excessively noisy. Our housing solicitors successfully resolved the issue by negotiating with the landlord of that neighbour, who served notice on them. Our housing solicitors were able to do this via mediation, which provided our client with a cost-effective alternative to entering protracted litigation.

    Case Study II

    We helped a tenant when a local authority started eviction proceedings against them following noise complaints about their family and their pet dogs. The council also applied for an injunction to prevent our client from engaging in anti-social behaviour and from keeping any pets in her home. Following representations from our housing solicitors, the council allowed our client to remain in her home and also keep one of her dogs. The injunction was also dropped, which removed the threat of a fine or prison sentence. The judge praised our handling of the case and spared our client the distress of going to court and giving evidence.

    Case Study III

    We settled a claim for Judicial Review, on behalf of a mother whose children have significant disabilities, mental health conditions and learning difficulties and were in unsuitable housing. The mother had submitted a wealth of medical evidence supporting the urgent need for her children to be moved for their health and welfare, but was consistently placed in incorrect banding under the allocations policy, meaning she didn’t have enough priority to be allocated a new, suitable home. We threatened a discrimination claim and negotiated with the other side, as a result the client was placed into the top band and moved into a new home, which she and the children are very happy with, within two months.

    Case Study IV

    Client wins case to have landlord pay compensation and costs for broken intercom needed for medical reasons.

    The client suffered from numerous, life-threatening medical conditions. He moved into a flat in a tower block where the door entry intercom had been removed, following a fire. The landlord had told the client that the door entry intercom was an obsolete system and could not be replaced, and that they were in the process of getting a new system. This had been the response for over a year and a half.

    This meant that the client was unable to open the door to the block from his flat. In this particular case that had severe consequences, as it meant that the client was unable to open the door to the block to let emergency medical services in. He suffered a number of heart attacks and was at risk of death if unable to get emergency medical attention. He was reliant on passers-by to open the door to the block to let paramedics in.

    Using the housing disrepair pre-action protocol we wrote to the landlord and arranged an urgent expert inspection of the intercom and wiring. Following this, the landlord managed to source a new handset and repair the electrical wiring which had been damaged by a fire before our client moved in. The client now has a working intercom and is able to let the paramedics in himself when he needs urgent medical attention. The landlord also agreed to pay compensation and costs.

    Back to top
    view all
    Jayesh Kunwardia
    Jayesh Kunwardia
    Partner
    Edward Sharp
    Edward Sharp
    Partner
    Farzana Chowdhury
    Farzana Chowdhury
    Partner
    Sophie Bell
    Sophie Bell
    Partner
    Elisabeth Garrett
    Paralegal
    Gregory Horne
    Gregory Horne
    Solicitor
    Imran Sarfraz
    Imran Sarfraz
    Solicitor
    Jacob Bartholomew-Smith
    Jacob Bartholomew-Smith
    Paralegal
    Mandhir Seera
    Trainee
    Mubashar Khurshid
    Solicitor
    Rabiah Farooq
    Rabiah Farooq
    Trainee
    Robyn Brett
    Robyn Brett
    Solicitor
    Ruth Kelliher
    Solicitor
    Sioned Wyn Roberts
    Sioned Wyn Roberts
    Senior Associate
    Tess Baker
    Tess Baker
    Solicitor

    Featured Cases

    Housing Rights
    Over the course of two months, we acted for a homeowner whose neighbour was excessively noisy. Our solicitors successfully resolved the issue by negotiating with the landlord of that neighbour, who served notice on them. Our solicitors were able to do this via mediation, which provided our client with a cost-effective alternative to entering protracted litigation.
    type of claim
    Noisy neighbour
    result
    noise issue resolved
    Housing Rights
    We helped a tenant when a local authority started eviction proceedings against them following noise complaints about their family and their pet dogs. The council also applied for an injunction to prevent our client from engaging in anti-social behaviour and from keeping any pets in her home. Following representations from our housing solicitors, the council allowed our client to remain in her home and also keep one of her dogs. The injunction was also dropped, which removed the threat of a fine or prison sentence. The judge praised our handling of the case and spared our client the distress of going to court and giving evidence.
    type of claim
    Eviction & Injunction
    result
    eviction & injunction dropped
    Housing Rights
    Our client's landlord issued a claim for possession on the grounds that there were alleged rent arrears exceeding £30,000. We defended our client on the basis that the actual arrears were a fraction of that alleged, and in brought a counterclaim for breach of quiet enjoyment, harassment, and disrepair. The premises suffered from water penetration, defective windows, and internal leaking. The landlord had failed to carry out the requisite repairs and had harassed our client to force him to pay the alleged outstanding rent and/or vacate the property. The landlord made regular threats of violence, switched off the gas and electricity supply by deliberately damaging the pipes, let himself into the premises without giving notice to the tenant and changed the locks. The possession claim was struck out and our client secured damages of £26,650, plus interest.
    type of claim
    Unlawful Eviction
    damages awarded
    £26,650 + interest
    Housing Rights
    We acted for a client after his social landlord, Genesis, sought to evict him. However, the background to the claim strongly suggested the real reason for the claim was alleged anti-social behaviour by the client. The client sought advice from two other firms, but both advised he had no defence. After a date for eviction was set, we represented him in our capacity as duty solicitor. We satisfied the judge that our client had a seriously arguable defence on Article 8/Public Law grounds and a timetable was set for trial. In compliance with the directions, we obtained a psychiatric assessment of our client that confirmed he suffered with developmental dyslexia and was disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. We continued to comply with the court timetable. We also entered into negotiations regarding settlement with Genesis and we successfully settled the claim with a general adjournment. The client retained his home.
    type of claim
    Eviction
    result
    eviction dropped
    Housing Rights
    Money was owed due to a change in circumstances and the knock-on effect on benefits. Over lockdown, the two Defendants' relationship broke down and they separated. This caused further issues with benefit due to the money owed being caused by further changes in circumstances. The first Defendant contracted Covid which led to their health deteriorating, and was subjected to bedroom tax deduction and only half the rent as tenancy was in joint names. We negotiated the settlement for proceedings to be put on hold for 6 months to allow further time to appeal the benefit award. Counterclaim was brought on the basis of disrepair and fitness for human habitation and the landlord agreed to pay compensation, which had the effect of cancelling out the money owed by £6,000.
    type of claim
    Money owed due to knock-on effect of benefits
    result
    proceedings adjourned & £6,000 compensation
    Housing Rights
    The client approached HJA after receiving a 'not in priority need' decision from Kensington and Chelsea. Our client suffers from mental health problems, is a victim of domestic abuse and suffered a miscarriage after being temporarily housed by the council in 2020. Following her miscarriage, the council found she wasn't in priority need, but failed to take into account that she's a victim of domestic abuse. We overturned their decision, however, they then found she was intentionally homeless from her last settled accommodation due to being evicted. We made further representations on her case, as the property wouldn't have been reasonable for her to continue occupying regardless of the eviction, as she was a victim of harassment here and her whereabouts were discovered by the perpetrator. The council finally concluded in our client’s favour and have accepted the main housing duty towards her.
    type of claim
    Unsuitable Accommodation
    result
    main housing duty was provided
    Housing Rights
    Appeal settled on the basis that when finding accommodation suitable for our client to occupy, the council had ignored the impact of anti-social behaviour on the client, particularly given her disabilities.
    nature of injury
    Unsuitable accommodation
    result
    appeal settled
    Housing Rights
    ADAPTATION TO PROPERTY: We represented a tenant who was deaf and her son who was blind. We sought for there to be two different type of doorbells fitted to the property - one audio and one visual - to make it easier for them to live in the property.
    Result
    Suitable adaptations fitted to property
    Housing Rights
    INCORRECT BANDING: We settled a claim, pre-issue, on behalf of a mother whose children have significant disabilities, mental health conditions and learning difficulties and were in unsuitable housing. The mother had submitted a wealth of medical evidence supporting the urgent need for her children to be moved for their health and welfare, but was consistently placed in incorrect banding under the allocations policy, meaning she didn’t have enough priority to be allocated a new, suitable home. We threatened a discrimination claim and negotiated with the other side, as a result the client was placed into the top band and moved into a new home, which she and the children are very happy with, within 2 months.
    Result
    Suitable home and compensation
    Housing Rights
    We represented a client in a possession action on the basis of rent arrears. The opponent’s son who managed the claim on her behalf was very difficult and had to be issued with a harassment warning during the course of proceedings. His lack of experience led to significant delays and to matters being unnecessarily litigious. Despite multiple attempts at settlement the matter proceeded to trial where we successfully opposed the son taking part on the basis that he was neither the claimant nor did he have rights of audience. Our application for summary judgement was heard as a prelim issue and was successful meaning the rest of the afternoon was spent calculating quantum. The possession claim was dismissed and client has retained her tenancy, she has also received around £4,000 in compensation for disrepair.
    nature of injury
    Housing Disrepair
    damages awarded
    £4,000
    View all

    Frequently asked questions

    Will I be evicted if my landlord takes me to court?

    This will depend on your tenancy agreement and the reason that the landlord is seeking possession. If you have an assured or secure tenancy, the court will not order possession unless grounds to do so have been proved and in many cases, only if it reasonable to do so.

    Although private tenants have less secure tenancies, there are often valid defences which can be put forward to avoid being evicted. We can advise you further in this regard.

    What can Ido about poor conditions in a property?

    All landlords, including local authorities, housing associations and private landlords, have a legal duty to maintain their property in an adequate state of repair and to ensure they’re fit for human habitation.

    They must also ensure that any defects in the property don’t pose a threat to the safety of tenants. If the property’s condition is unacceptable then we can help advise you on the best course of action.

    This might include applying for a court order requiring the council or landlord to put things right. The court can also award you compensation where repairs have been delayed for no good reason and impose fines on landlords who don’t maintain their property correctly.

     

    What is the cost for a housing claim?

    Housing legal claims can differ in cost. Our expert housing solicitors will clearly set out all your funding options as soon as we know the details of your case. We will never incur costs on your behalf without your full agreement and knowledge.

    If you’re not entitled to public funding, we can discuss other ways of funding your case, including private arrangements or a ‘Conditional Fee Arrangement’, (often described as ‘no win, no fee’).

    Further Reading
    View all