Get In Touch
Falsely Accused of Crime

Protest & Political Interest

Raj Chada
Partner
Ruth Harris
Ruth Harris
Partner
Caroline Liggins
Caroline Liggins
Partner
Chloe Hartnell
Chloe Hartnell
Partner
Darrell Ennis-Gayle
Darrell Ennis-Gayle
Partner
Graeme Hydari
Graeme Hydari
Partner
Jessica Davis
Partner
Kerry Spence
Kerry Spence
Partner
Laura O'Brien
Laura O’Brien
Partner
Mike Schwarz
Mike Schwarz
Partner
Sean Caulfield
Sean Caulfield
Partner
Ailsa McNeil
Ailsa McNeil
Solicitor
Amy Coulter
Amy Coulter
Solicitor
Aneka Thirurajah
Aneka Thirurajah
Senior Associate
Anna Williams
Anna Williams
Paralegal
Ben Follows
Ben Follows
Paralegal
Bethany Gerrard
Bethany Gerrard
Trainee
Casey Jenkins
Senior Associate
Earnestina Rajaratnam
Earnestina Rajaratnam
Paralegal
Eliza Bell
Trainee
Elizabeth Andrewartha
Solicitor
Ella Ferriter
Paralegal
Emily McNally
Emily McNally
Solicitor
Fatima Qaid
Fatima Qaid
Paralegal
Francesca Cociani
Francesca Cociani
Senior Associate
George Steel
George Steel
Solicitor
Georgia Prichard
Georgia Prichard
Trainee
Ghislaine Sandoval
Ghislaine Sandoval
Associate
Jessica Atkinson
Jessica Atkinson
Solicitor
Jessica Murray
Jessica Murray
Associate
Jiawen Guo
Paralegal
Justin Stuart-Mills
Consultant Solicitor
Katie McFadden
Katie McFadden
Associate
Katy O'Mara
Katy o’Mara
Associate
Kiran Mehta
Kiran Mehta
Consultant
Lara Ideo
Solicitor
Marina Afzal-Khan
Marina Afzal-Khan
Paralegal
May Spencer
May Spencer
Paralegal
Michael Ackah
Senior Associate
Priya Pandya
Priya Pandya
Paralegal
Rabiah Farooq
Rabiah Farooq
Trainee
Rebecca Field
Rebecca Field
Solicitor
Scarlett Roberts
Scarlett Roberts
Trainee
Shelby Keppel
Shelby Keppel
Consultant
Shyan MacTavish_Website
Shyan MacTavish
Associate
Somaya Yassine_Website
Somaya Yassine
Paralegal
Tosin Akinboboye
Tosin Akinboboye
Solicitor
Viviane Bablin
Viviane Bablin
Solicitor

Hodge Jones & Allen is one of the leading firms dealing with cases with a political dimension.

These occur if you’re arrested at a protest or direct action or if you are being stopped or punished for what you’ve said. You might be a journalist reporting on events or even a politician or political/trade union activist.

Each of these situations requires a lawyer who knows the different political considerations involved and will use their skills to help the client navigate the issues.

Our Protest Law solicitors are top-ranked Band 1 in the Chambers UK legal directory. They have been recognised as a ‘leading protest law team with considerable experience representing defendants in complex and high-profile cases’.

HJA Chambers firm logo 2025“Working with the teams there is a good grasp on up to date information in a rapidly changing legal landscape for protest.” – Chambers UK, 2025

Legal 500 UK - Top Tier Firm-2025

A full service firm with a particularly strong presence in protest law.” – Legal 500, 2025

Why choose Hodge Jones & Allen?

We fight for what’s right. Many of our lawyers are active in politics or wider social justice causes themselves. As well as our technical knowledge of the law, we understand what our clients seek to achieve and how they seek to achieve it. We work collaboratively and innovatively with our colleagues in the Civil Liberties & Human Rights team to achieve our clients’ objectives.

Experience

We’ve been representing protestors involved in high profile events for many years.. This includes Extinction Rebellion (protest in central London about climate crisis), Heathrow 13 (protest about 3rd runway and environmental concerns), animal rights (SHAC), Occupy, anti- austerity and trade union marches. We make a difference as we’re experts in these areas.

Experts in reviewing police powers

On each occasion, prosecution cases need to be forensically analysed. This is to determine whether the police were using their powers properly and whether those powers were consistent with the European Convention on Human Rights. Experts in holding the police to account in public order situations, we ensure our client’s fundamental human rights are protected.

Experts in direct action cases

Direct action cases, such as Stansted 15 (seeking to prevent people being unlawfully deported by the Government on Charter flights, where those people’s lives were at risk on return) or where activists sought to prevent promotion of torture and other unlawful weapons at the DSEI arms fair, have their own challenges. Expertise in using justification or necessity defences and showing that the activists were acting in a reasonable and proportionate way to prevent a greater harm from occurring.

Experts in free speech and human rights

HJA also acts in the niche area where your right to free speech is being threatened by other state bodies. For example, we’ve acted where students have been told they will face disciplinary proceedings for protesting or voicing their opinion, and where other institutions take action because of certain held beliefs. This requires lawyers that specialise in European Human Rights but also a background in litigation.

Experts for journalists

As well as protestors or activists, others can be caught up in political actions. We act for journalists who have been covering events and sought to protect and enhance the principle of a free press. Our knowledge and personal commitment to these principles has allowed us to join fights against censorship and to scrutinize police actions in high profile situations.

"Very grateful to Laura O'Brien who did a great job representing me in Insulate Britain public nuisance crown court trial, involving myself and 3 other defendants who self represented, in which we were found not guilty."

Experts for politicians / trade unions

We advise politicians who are being investigated themselves. We’ve had notable success in these areas and we understand that, in these cases, how the defence is conducted is as important as the legal outcome. Our clients value our subtle and discreet approach. We know that for many of our clients, their reputation during an investigation is almost as important as the outcome itself.

Back to top

How to get in touch?

Top Ranked Solicitors

Our top ranking team have years of experience representing the innocent. We stand up to the prosecution. Our clients will always be represented by an experienced solicitor or barrister. We know how to fight and win cases.

Here to help

Representing you at the Police Station or in Court If you need urgent representation call us today. Share a few details with us and we’ll let you know how we can help you.

Call FREE 24 hours a day

If you are calling outside our offices hours (9:30am to 5:30pm) call our free phone 24 telephone on 0808 274 8226. There will always be someone at the other end of the telephone to assist you.

“Everyone who works for this company is kind and considerate, they all really care and are passionate about their work. They are efficient at their jobs and experts on protest law. They also respect the names ad pronouns of their trans clients which is also really appreciated. I felt well looked after in court, and well supported and advocated for by Laura O’Brien during court. Somaya Yassine was also amazing at organising everything beforehand.”

Contact our specialist team on
0330 822 3451
or request a call back.
Back to top

Featured Cases

Protest & Political Interest

PROTESTORS AGAINST THE ARMS TRADE: Since 2011, Hodge Jones & Allen has acted for protestors against the arms trade in the Excel Centre at the bi-annual Arms Fair. Despite hundreds of arrests and prosecutions, Hodge Jones & Allen have secured not guilty verdicts on the vast majority of occasions.

Protest & Political Interest

PROTESTORS AGAINST MIGRANTS DEPORTATION TO UNSAFE COUNTRIES: Stansted 15. Acted for all 15 defendants in a joint action by End Deportations, Lesbians and Gays Support the Migrants and Plane Stupid. Action sought to prevent the deportation of migrants to unsafe countries. Clients have had their conviction of “endangering safety at a public airport”, a terror related offence, quashed by the Court of Appeal.

Protest & Political Interest

EXPENSES SCANDAL: Acted for a peer during the expenses scandal. Considering the parliamentary system of expenses and rules – with minimum sentence imposed as a result.

Protest & Political Interest

RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH: Acted for 2 journalists who were covering a demonstration in central London. Cases dropped after representations based on the right to free speech.

Protest & Political Interest

ANTI-AUSTERITY MARCHE: FM 145 – Acted for a number of clients in the UK UNCUT occupation of Fortnum and Mason during the anti- austerity marches. Secured the first acquittals in the case, ending with all, however one Hodge Jones & Allen client had been acquitted.

View all

Frequently asked questions

Can the Police restrict the demonstrations, protests or processions?

Under section 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act, the senior officer present at the scene of a procession or assembly may impose conditions on a demonstration.

The senior officer can impose conditions, if having regard to all the circumstances, he reasonably believes that it may result in:

  • Serious public disorder
  • Serious damage to property
  • Serious disruption to the life of the community.
  • The purpose of the organizer(s) is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling them “not to do an act which they have a right to do”.

The officer will need to take into account your right to free speech and protest as set out in the European Convention of Human Rights (articles 10 and 11). There can often be arguments about whether the conditions were properly imposed or whether they have been properly communicated to the protestors.

Can I use a necessity defence in my case?

There is an overall defence in criminal cases, only available in limited cases where you are only doing something to prevent another criminal offence, where you are seeking to prevent damage elsewhere from occurring or where you are seeking to prevent death or serious injury to others. These types of defences have been used, with varying degrees of success, for protestors in the past. In a necessity defence, broadly the court will have to address the following questions

Was the offence [act] committed by you necessary, or did you reasonably believed [them] to have been necessary, for the purpose of avoiding or preventing death or serious injury to yourself or others

Was the commission of the offence, viewed objectively (i.e. by a sober person of reasonable firmness of the same age and gender as you) reasonable and proportionate, having regard to the evil to be avoided

In protest cases, this can be a difficult defence to succeed on. There are difficulties that the prosecution will argue that the danger is too remote from your actions and that what you were really doing was raising publicity to persuade the government to implement new policies – rather than directly saving someone’s life yourself. The prosecution will also argue that the defence does not apply as you are acting out of “general concern” rather than for specific individuals that you might have some responsibility for. However, we have experience and expertise of putting these defences forwarded in a range of circumstances.

Further Reading
View all

"I TOTALLY FELT AT EASE EVERY STEP OF THE WAY WITH THEM BY MY SIDE AND IN MY CORNER."